ASROCK Broadwell-E

ASRock confirms Broadwell-E SKUs

ASRock recently circulated a press release to inform its users about its Intel x99 chipset based motherboards now have a new BIOS which enabled them to use the new LGA 2011-E Broadwell-E CPUs.

It is unlikely that this update is accidentally out. This update is also available on its website and usually, it gets taken down. ASRock also mentioned that “Clearly the new chips aren’t available in the market yet, but if patience isn’t your strong suit, then perhaps you could get a two minute head start by downloading the BIOS and upgrading now.” which makes it even more obvious that it was an intentional release and not an accidental ‘leak’.

The Broadwell-E SKUs that’s mentioned in the update are the flagship ten-core CPU the Core i7-6950X, followed by the Core i7-6900K, Core i7-6850K and the Core i7-6800K. The news update confirms some of the long-standing rumours that the i7-6950X is a ten core twenty threads based Broadwell-E architecture.

The new BIOS for ASRock X99 motherboards can be downloaded from here.

It’s a no-brainer that other manufacturers should be providing updates for the Broadwell-E compatibility. While the official release dates are not out, it shouldn’t be long since BIOS updates have started rolling out.

Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Article
oculus rift pack

Oculus suffering from massive shipping delays for Rift VR headsets

Next Article
AMD-Radeon-Pro-Duo 3

AMD Radeon Pro Duo GPU gets pictured!

Related Posts
Read More

WD (silently) admitted its NAS HDD goof-up by releasing CMR-based Red Plus series

Western Digital is releasing the CMR-based Red Plus series NAS HDDs. This series assures ZFS compatibility for NAS, one of the features that were supposed to be a part of Red sub-branding. This is the action WD took well after being called out for switch-and-bait of WD Red models from the EFRX which used SMR to EFAX models between 2TB-to-6TB that used the lower performing and lesser reliable (for NAS) CMR technology. It all started with a lack of clarity from WD which kept defending its stance after the crowd-sourced evidence of NAS-specific issues.