970_Block_Diagram

Nvidia says GTX 970 works the ways its designed to work

Thanks to GTX 960, a lot of people see more value and long term in investing in GTX 970 in comparison with certain GTX 960. But the stifled performance due to a bug (or ‘bug’- depending on how you would see it) is beginning to make people think twice. Complaints kept adding up to a point where reviewers (the real ones) and users started highlighting the issue.

Like boiling water, this triggered large community discussions in known PC tech forums and Reddit. Like any large discussions, there were those with sane explanation, seemingly far-fetched stories that would put UFO conspiracy theorists to shame and the usual fanboy brigade.

nvidia logo

 

For those who haven’t read the original report, many Nvidia GTX 970 users complained that they’ve noticed severe performance degrade once the VRAM consumption crosses 3.5GB. In certain scenarios depending on the in-game setting and screen resolution, 500MB- 700MB memory couldn’t be used properly. Some users also pointed out that the Vmem bandwidth is falling from 150GB/s to as low as 20GB/s. Most of the complaints were single card users as far I’ve observed. Many users found this issue to have very noticeable effect on games like Shadows of Mordor and Watch Dogs.

We also managed to find a user who recorded the glitches (using Nvidia Shadowplay) while playing Far Cry 4. Along with the glitches, you can clearly see stuttering and a temporary freezing issue.

Some called it foul play- saying that it was to make GTX 980 look good. Some said it wouldn’t make sense for Nvidia to stifle memory of all things when they could have achieved it in a much better way via the GPU core design.

Eventually, all this made Nvidia Global HQ to speak up via a press release:

970_Block_Diagram

The same message was posted in Nvidia GeForce forums in an existing thread started by the users. As we can gather from what Nvidia says (some fancy fellows will use the word ‘claim’), the way SMM (Steaming Multiprocessor Maxwell) is implemented for the GM204 core is the root cause of the issue.

This could be the reason why Nvidia didn’t release GTX 960 Ti, which is supposed to use the GM 204. Nvidia would end up disabling cores (and hence the SMMs associated with each of those cores) for the GTX 960 Ti which may cause a much larger performance gap. In any which case, Nvidia’s official response does not provide a confident yes or a no. While GTX 970 still is a good card, the flaws reflecting at point of gameplay turns out to be a concern. It’s also unclear if newer drivers or GPU bios would help to fix or reduce the issue.

Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Beyond News. Beyond Reviews. Beyond Guides & Recommendations.

Join the never ending discussions on never ending topics.
Previous Article
GTX 970

Nvidia GTX 970 haunted with memory allocation issue, affecting in-game performance

Next Article
Nvidia-GeForce-GTX

Nvidia corrects its GeForce GTX 970 technical specification details

Related Posts

Beyond News. Beyond Reviews. Beyond Guides & Recommendations.

Hardware BBQ is a PC hardware review, news and recommendations website. Typical of such PC hardware websites, I encourage two-way communication and discussions. Help us to help everybody by being a part of it. I am pretty active on Twitter. But for any detailed discussions and inquiries, you can always join the Discord group for any discussions.The future plans include streaming on Twitch, but I'll let you if and when that plan is made. Don't forget to follow the channel if you're interested.